Monday, March 31, 2025

Event examines PJ, empathy, rebuilding trust in media
(Milwaukee, Wisconsin)-Re-framing, and re-emphasizing, peace journalism approaches was on the menu on Friday at the insightful 2025 Nieman Symposium sponsored by Marquette University’s Diederich College of Communications.

The event featured two panels and a keynoter addressing the subject, “Journalism in the face of conflict and contemporary politics.”

The re-framing content came from Dr. Sue Robinson from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She framed peace journalism as a practice that should be guided by care—caring about the subjects we report about; and being a caregiver for those who have been marginalized or victimized. Robinson laid out five qualities of care for the audience of students and faculty members. These are attentiveness, responsibility, confidence, responsiveness, and solidarity. She also emphasized the importance of community building, and of listening and learning, that in turn stoke the empathy that journalists need.

While she didn’t use the term peace journalism, I think Dr. Robinson hit upon a key PJ principle nonetheless—that to build bridges, give a voice to the marginalized, offer counternarratives, and do the other things peace journalists do, one must have a foundation build on empathy.

Catherine Gicheru (L), Sudeshna Roy at Marquette Univ.


The event’s keynote speaker, Kenyan journalist, editor, and founder of the African Women Journalists’ Project Catherine Gicheru, re-emphasized many of the most compelling justifications for peace journalism. She talked about the divisive forces corroding society, including political polarization, economic marginalization, societal exclusion, and disinformation. Gicheru challenged the traditional objectivity model, noting that “Journalism is never neutral,” and that it is a journalist’s responsibility to speak truth to power.

She also opined about how journalists can help restore the public’s trust in the media by re-thinking the voices they amplify (“voice of the voiceless” in PJ parlance); working with survivors; and connecting with regular people on the ground through mechanisms like community radio. Gicheru stressed the importance of these connections, noting that, “Building bridges starts with the stories we tell.”

Building bridges is one of the concepts I emphasized in my presentation that began with the basics of peace journalism, then slid into a discussion of my recent PJ work. This includes bridge building cross border journalism programs with Indian and Pakistani journalists, as well as a project that brought together journalists from Northern Ireland and Kosovo to discuss how to responsibly report about past violent events in both places, and how those events are memorialized.

Other informative panelists included exiled journalists Pedro Molina and Juan Carlos Ampie from Nicaragua, and Anuradha Bhasin from Indian-controlled Kashmir. They discussed how journalists were silenced in their countries. Bhasin said journalism was “torn limb by limb” in Kashmir. All three warned that the same can happen here in the U.S., or anywhere. Molina noted that the best way to keep our rights is to exercise them.

Dr. Susan Moeller from the University of Maryland also presented an interesting discussion about what makes news consumers care about the world, and about how peace journalism and ethical journalism are synonymous.

It was an honor to be among these august panelists, and to hear support for the concepts of peace journalism, whether it was called that or not. Hats off to Dr. Sudeshna Roy for organizing this vitally important event.

Exiles journalists' panel, Nieman Symposium



Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Media development cutoffs threaten democracies worldwide
International media outlets and media development projects, like many of the initiatives I’ve been engaged in for years, have been severely impacted by the cutoff of U.S. foreign aid funding and the decimation of USAID. 

These cutoffs are ill-conceived and deeply damaging to democracy around the world as well at America's national interest.

The foreign aid freeze includes $268 million that was targeted to support independent media and a free flow of information around the world. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) “denounces this decision, which has plunged NGOs, media outlets, and journalists doing vital work into chaotic uncertainty.” RSF says, “The affected organizations include large international NGOs that support independent media like the International Fund for Public Interest Media and smaller, individual media outlets serving audiences living under repressive conditions in countries like Iran and Russia.” RSF reports that according to a USAID fact sheet which has since been taken offline, in 2023, “the agency funded training and support for 6,200 journalists, assisted 707 non-state news outlets, and supported 279 media-sector civil society organizations dedicated to strengthening independent media.” 

Further, “The ripple effects of the aid freeze … also threaten to cripple news organizations that indirectly rely on USAID and State Department support via groups such as the National Endowment for Democracy. The non-governmental organization is funded by the U.S. government and provided $51 million in support to media outlets in 2022, according to a press release.” (ICJI)

In addition, the funding stoppage will also “set back the global movement for media freedom by years,” according to an  insightful article by Nicholas Benequista.

The freeze also torpedoed important programs to combat disinformation in Eastern Europe, including Moldova, which is ground zero for corrosive Russian propaganda. I was incensed to hear the president list “32 million for a left wing propaganda operation in Moldova” as an example of wasteful spending during his speech to congress in March. This “propaganda operation” was in fact not propaganda, but well-calibrated programming to counter Russian disinformation and give Moldova a chance for a prosperous, democratic future. To callously criticize this worthwhile endeavor empowers the propagandists in Moscow and legitimizes their dark agenda. (You can read about these laudable anti-disinformation efforts in the April 2024 Peace Journalist magazine.)

Since 2007, many of my endeavors teaching peace journalism, media literacy, and countering  disinformation have been funded directly or indirectly through the U.S. government, including the Pakistan radio project detailed in this magazine (pg. 4); a year-long project that succeeded in preventing media-induced election violence in Uganda; a cross-border reporting project that united Indian and Pakistani journalists to use storytelling to build bridges instead of fuel hatred; and a peace journalism project that taught reporters in the Sahel region how to counter violent extremism—hardly “left wing propaganda.” And this doesn’t even count the work I’ve done as a three-time Fulbright Scholar, including my projects last year in Moldova (for content creators and for fifth graders) that taught youth to recognize and counter disinformation.

I’m proud of all of these projects and their demonstrably positive impacts, and believe each to be a smart, efficient use of taxpayer funds. All of my projects put together, and the $268 million of media aid currently frozen, don’t come close to adding up the cost of just one F-22 fighter jet--$350 million. (Aerotime)

This media development work, and the projects done by USAID and its sister organizations like the U.S. Institute of Peace and the East-West Center, where I am a journalism program coordinator, make the U.S more secure by making the world a more peaceful place—all at a tiny fraction of the cost of military hardware or interventions.

Given our perilous world, we should be doubling down on projects that fund free press and combating disinformation--not doing the opposite.