Friday, April 3, 2020

Should we call Covid-19 a 'crisis' and a "pandemic'?
As I wrote in the new Peace Journalist magazine, reporting Covid-19 poses many challenges for peace journalists. One of those challenges involves the language we use.

On Twitter, Peter Moor, an Ulster University (Northern Ireland) student who attended one of my lectures in N.I., asks:
What is your opinion on the using the word ‘crisis’ in ref to Covid-19. Is this word inflammatory/accurate representation of what is going on? What about ‘pandemic’ - is a pandemic naturally a crisis?

Let me start with the easy one—“pandemic.” This is technical epidemiological term employed in a precise way by scientists and health experts. The WHO has labeled this outbreak a pandemic, using scientific data to back up this conclusion. Thus, I think journalists are perfectly justified in using this word to describe what is happening. (For more, see CDC and WHO info on pandemics).

The term “crisis” is stickier.

As peace journalists, we avoid language that is subjective, inflammatory, and sensational, words like “massacre,” “bloody,” and “martyr.” These words usually add no information to a story, and only add fuel to the fire. Such words are highly subjective, reflecting only the journalist’s interpretation of events.

As for “crisis,” which can be defined as “a turning point…or a dramatic emotional or circumstantial upheaval in a person's life” (dictionary.com), the word is certainly subjective since each individual has a different interpretation of what constitutes a crisis. That said, we as journalists can certainly report the interpretations of public health experts who have labeled Covid-19 a crisis. Since they are the experts, it seems to me we are safe in using the word since that’s what the experts unanimously believe. In this instance, “crisis” is neither sensational nor inflammatory since it’s not adding fuel to the fire, exacerbating the situation, or frightening people unnecessarily.

Finally, as our perceptive student Peter Moor points out, one can reasonably conclude that a pandemic declaration automatically qualifies an outbreak as a crisis.

For more about PJ and Covid-19, see the lead article in the April Peace Journalist magazine (details below in previous post).

Thursday, March 26, 2020

The Peace Journalist magazine is here!
The Peace Journalist magazine is out, featuring special reports on #COVID19 & PJ; a #peacejournalism project in #NorthernIreland; @sarahmargon discussing human rights and journalism @parkuniversity;  and media and disinformation at the World Forum for Democracy in France.  See link to magazine posted on Issuu. 

Sunday, March 15, 2020

Amid traumatic threat, seminar discusses trauma reporting

(DERRY AND BELFAST, NORTHERN IRELAND)-As we bumped elbows in greeting, an odd gesture done in lieu of hand-shaking, it occurred to me that the two trauma reporting seminars that we did last Thursday in Derry and Friday in Belfast may be the last such face-to-face seminars in Northern Ireland for weeks, even months, thanks to Covid-19.
At BelfastMet trauma reporting seminar
(Photo by Allan Leonard)

While attendance at the Derry event was low, the Belfast seminar at BelfastMet College’s E-3 Campus was well attended. Most of the Belfast attendees were BelfastMet students.

At the outset, I was worried that the minds of both the participants and attendees wouldn't be focused on the subject at hand, but instead on the Covid 19 virus. I know my attention seemed divided. However, the workshops’ energetic presenters and inquisitive attendees soon disabused me of this notion.

The first presenter, journalist Kathryn Johnston, talked about her murdered friend and reporting colleague Lyra McKee, and about how journalists continue to operate under threat in Northern Ireland. Johnston said McKee would “have been the first to look and those who shot her and ask why.” Later, Johnston would discuss the establishment of a bursary (scholarship/grant) in Lyra’s name to support young journalists engaged in depth reporting. Details about the bursary are still pending, she said.

Paul Gallagher, WAVE trauma centre (Photo by Allan Leonard)
Paul Gallagher, a Queen’s University lecturer, Ph.D. candidate, and survivor of “Troubles” violence that left him without the use of his legs, then discussed trauma and victims. He talked about how victims are not homogenous, and indeed the appropriateness of using the label “victim.” (Gallagher, who also works with the WAVE Trauma Centre, doesn’t mind being called a victim since “it doesn’t define me.”) He talked about how the clock stops on one’s previous life after a trauma, and how victims are often vulnerable and stigmatized. He led an interesting discussion about how journalists can exacerbate trauma, and what role, if any, journalists have in repairing trauma. Gallagher finished by sharing his tips for more responsible trauma reporting including validating individual experiences, helping to create a trauma-informed society, and two themes I would discuss later—giving victims back their voice, and countering dominant narratives about victims.

Peace journalism pioneer Dr. Jake Lynch from the University of Sydney discussed several concepts of peace, including justpeace, defined as a process of peaccebuilding that includes adaptive processes, structures, and practices grounded in relationships and characterized by low violence and high justice. He also discussed peacebulding gaps like the difficulty in transferring grassroots peacebuilding energy and ideas to decision-makers and elites higher up the food chain. Later, Lynch presented ideas about how media can structure itself to favor justpeace. He cited several examples from Northern Ireland showing media already doing this, including View magazine’s victims issue. Lynch finished by discussing media effects, and a study he led that demonstrated the efficacy of the peace journalism approach in creating societal opportunities for justpeace.

In a presentation on covering anniversaries and marches, journalist Alan Meban led a discussion about the phrases used in such coverage (flashpoints, sectarian, controversial), and shepherded an interesting critique of several stories, one of which discussed the anniversary of a “Troubles” bombing, while the other covered a gay pride parade using hateful, stereotyping language like “flamboyant.”

I presented on socially responsible trauma reporting, and shared with the crowd several pillars of such reporting. (See below)
Good student feedback at BelfastMet's E-3 Campus
(Photo by Allan Leonard)

Journalists and Shared Future News editor Allan Leonard showed the attendees many platforms that display more responsible trauma reporting coverage which offers counternarratives and the voice of the voiceless. These include Peace Direct, Café Babel, France 24 (FOCUS segments), NVTV from Northern Ireland, Northern Slant, and Shared Future News (https://sharedfuture.news/).

After the BelfastMet seminar, it dawned on me that, tragically, there will probably be more victims being created both in Northern Ireland and the world, and that our seminar, sadly, could not have been more timely. On this count, I fervently hope I’m wrong.

The Northern Ireland peace journalism project was sponsored by the US Embassy-London and the US Consulate-Belfast.

PILLARS OF RESPONSIBLE CONFLICT AND TRAUMA REPORTING—

Ask yourself these questions: What does the public need to know, and how much coverage is too much? When do reporters become obsessed with a story when the public is not? A community is more than a mass killing or disaster or conflict.

1. Always consider the impact of your reporting. Don’t gratuitously make things worse for the people whose stories you report, or for the general public. 
2. Accuracy is paramount. First rumors can be dramatic and exaggerated. Facts can be slippery in mid-crisis. Inaccurately quoting a victim can be traumatic. Check, double check, triple check facts.Make sure the person knows you will have to check the facts. Go back over the interview with them.
3. Journalists should thoughtfully select the images they use, understanding that they can misrepresent an event, exacerbate an already dire situation, and re-victimize those who have been traumatized.
4. Don’t prematurely jump on the “blame” bandwagon, or to conclusions, and consider the impact of “blame” reporting on traumatized victims and the public. Later, journalists should lead societal discussions about solutions (without advocating for any one solution).
5. Don’t intrude. The National Union of Journalists (UK) code of conduct says, a journalist “does nothing to intrude into anybody’s private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest. Be honest and clear about what you are doing. Identify yourself.
6. Avoid inflammatory, sensational language that exacerbates or fuels conflict or trauma. Never embellish stories. 
7. Do your research so you know the background and be sensitive to contested narratives and language.
8. When reporting about conflict or trauma, journalists should give a voice to the vulnerable, marginalized voiceless in their societies—women, youth, minorities, the poor, etc.
9. Journalists should reject formulaic, stereotypical coverage and instead offer counternarratives about the trauma, its impact, and those affected.
--From: https://dartcenter.org/sites/default/files/DCE_JournoTraumaHandbook.pdf ; NUJ Trauma Reporting Handbook, and developed from principles of peace journalism by Steven Youngblood



Wednesday, March 11, 2020


PJ, ETHICS, AND MARTYRDOM IN N.I.
(Belfast, Northern Ireland)-I’ve had some interesting discussions about whether journalists should use the term “martyr,” but none so engaging as our interchange yesterday at the US Consulate.

In previous seminars in Kashmir and Beirut, journalists told me that they labeled anyone who died fighting Israelis or Indians a martyr. I told them that, to me, using this term puts gasoline on the fire and exacerbates tensions and divisions. 

Here in Belfast, the discussion centered around those who self identify as martyrs as they commit some heinous act like blowing themselves up. Should the press call them martyrs, since that’s what they call themselves? Several attendees said yes, that it’s journalists’ obligation to use people’s self identification. I’m not so sure, I said. What if the bomber called himself a hero? Should the press repeat that label?

We also had a vibrant talk about false equivalencies, and the pitfalls they pose for journalists. This topic is especially fraught here, given Northern Ireland’s history.
My presentation introduced peace journalism and reconciliation, and showed their connection to traditional journalism ethics. One participant was skeptical, saying that peace journalism “doesn’t exist” and is merely good journalism. I replied that PJ is grounded in good journalism, but is transcendent since it includes suggestions that media give a voice to the voiceless, discuss solutions, and offer counternarrative storytelling.

My visit here this week is sponsored by the U.S. Consulate and U.S. Embassy in London. It continues with two trauma reporting workshops on Thursday in Derry and Friday in Belfast.



Monday, March 9, 2020

SESSION CONSIDERS SOCIAL MEDIA IMPACT, FUTURE
(Belfast, Northern Ireland)-It was ironic, and poignant, that my first presentation in Belfast this month was at the Girdwood Community Hub, a former army barracks during the Troubles repurposed as a community center.


At the event sponsored by Belfast Metropolitan College, I spoke briefly about social media and peace journalism. I led off with an interesting stat, a poll showing that only 22% of Northern Irish trust social media. My message was that social media can better serve the public, and peace, using peace journalism principles.

In a vibrant discussion after my talk, the most difficult question thrown my way asked me to predict the future of social media. My “glass half empty” response was that social media will increasingly empower demagogues and authoritarian regimes. My “glass half full” response was that an increasingly media literate public will use social media as a tool to build bridges and facilitate dialogues for peace.

I was also asked to predict the 2016 US presidential election, which I did.

My presentation was part of a conference at BelfastMet that introduced participants, many of whom work with disadvantaged youth, to a program called Live Skills, which helps young people develop careers in fields using digital technologies (creative media, digital art and design, and digital marketing).