Confidence that peace journalism will prevail in Uganda
As elections unfold in East Africa,
like the one happening in Uganda this week, thoughts drift to those awful days following
the 2007 Kenyan election.
Media-fueled post-election violence
took a terrible toll in late 2007 and early 2008. 1,200 Kenyans were killed,
many thousands injured, and over 300,000 people displaced, according to UNHCR
statistics. 42,000 homes and businesses were looted or destroyed. The media,
particularly local-language radio stations, played a significant role in the
violence. According to IRIN Humanitarian
News, “Inflammatory statements and songs broadcast on vernacular radio
stations and at party rallies, text messages, emails, posters and leaflets have
all contributed to post-electoral violence in Kenya, according to analysts. Vernacular
radio broadcasts have been of particular concern... (From Peace Journalism Principles and Practices, Routledge
Publishing/Taylor and Francis Books, to be published fall 2016)
With the Kenyan experience fresh in
their minds, the Peace Journalism Foundation of East Africa and the Center for
Global Peace Journalism launched an 11-month effort to train Ugandan radio
reporters and editors in peace journalism prior to the 2011 Ugandan
presidential election. Traveling 14,000 kilometers to every corner of the
country, my training partner Gloria Laker and I worked with hundreds of
journalists on peace journalism theory and responsible electoral reporting. The
goal of the project was to prevent media induced or exacerbated violence at the
time of the election. The project succeeded. There was no media fueled violence
in 2011. A comprehensive survey of media practitioners at the project’s
conclusion gave credit for the lack of media fueled violence to Gloria’s
peace and electoral journalism project.
Further, a number of peace journalism trainings
in Kenya (several by Gloria Laker and myself in Eldoret and Nairobi, and others with Dr. Fredrick Ogenga at the University of Rongo) prior to the 2013
Kenyan election also had the desired result—an election devoid of media induced
or exacerbated violence. (For the record, some have criticized the Kenyan media
for going too far, and not reporting election irregularities in 2013 for fear
of stoking violence--a practice not condoned by peace journalism).
On election day in Uganda this
Thursday, Gloria and I believe that our trainings five years ago will still
resonate with radio reporters and editors. However, even if our workshops are
forgotten, it’s our hope that journalists will remember the lessons from Kenya
in 2007 and from post-election violence in Uganda in 2006.
The words I wrote during my first
visit to Uganda resonate as much today as when I first penned them in 2009.
“As I peered out at the Ugandan radio journalists in my peace
journalism class, I came to the stark realization that they are literally in a
position to make life and death decisions. Radio in this part of the world is
that important, that influential. The wrong words said the wrong way at the
wrong time can, and have, led to violence, even death… As the students and I
closed an emotional discussion about hate radio, I was encouraged when one
student said that ‘it’s up to us’ to spread the word about the power of radio,
and the awesome responsibility radio journalists here have to use their
platform to promote peace and reconciliation instead of hate and violence.” (Peace Journalism Principles and Practices, 2016).
I am confident our Ugandan radio colleagues will do their jobs
responsibly and ethically on Thursday and the days that follow. Here’s hoping
that they can do so safely as well.
NOTES: For a
comprehensive look at Ugandan elections, see this well-researched piece in the Guardian newspaper.
And for an examination of the election
through the eyes of the country’s LGBT population, see this excellent New York Times column.
No comments:
Post a Comment