Sometimes, the best we can do is to not make things worse
(Bahir Dar, Ethiopia)-As is frequently the case, the most
interesting discussions at a conference occur on the sidelines.
After my introduction to peace journalism keynote at the
International Conference on Language, Culture, and Communication this week at Bahir Dar
University, I had an invigorating discussion with four Ethiopian communications
professors about peace journalism. We talked about whether PJ is possible in
Ethiopia. (Consensus: It can be implemented here, at least in part). The most
interesting point made by an Ethiopian professor was that PJ stops being
peaceful when journalists report news that will make people uncomfortable or
angry. He used an example of police shooting and killing protesters to
illustrate his point. How can we report a story like this without creating
anger or sparking a riot, he asked?
My response was unsatisfying to him and to me: Sometimes,
the best we can do as journalists is to not exacerbate the situation, to not
pour gasoline on an already blazing fire. We all agreed that this police
shooting story must be reported, since it’s clearly news. I added that not
reporting a story like this would invite rumors and misrepresentations, and
could potentially make matters worse.
Here in Ethiopia, this police shooting story is hardly
hypothetical, since dozens of anti-government protesters have been killed
during the last three years.
Other conference highlights
International conference sessions at BDU included a presentation of political identification in Ethiopia as reflected on Facebook, by far the most popular social medium here. Prof. Tesfaye Zelalem found that Ethiopia’s two biggest political parties use FB to belittle their opponents, thus missing out on an opportunity to engage in reasoned, reciprocal, productive discussions about substantive issues.
International conference sessions at BDU included a presentation of political identification in Ethiopia as reflected on Facebook, by far the most popular social medium here. Prof. Tesfaye Zelalem found that Ethiopia’s two biggest political parties use FB to belittle their opponents, thus missing out on an opportunity to engage in reasoned, reciprocal, productive discussions about substantive issues.
Prof. Feyisa Mulisa presented research about FB which
showed, unsurprisingly, that high school students spend much more time on
social media for recreation than for academics. He suggested finding a way to
better engage students academically on social media.
Dr. Adem Chanie’s research was about how the Ethiopian
government entity BOLSA ineffectively communicates to and about their
constituency, the disabled. He recommended participatory communication
approaches that would better engage the disabled.
Overall, it was an excellent conference, and a fine
opportunity to exchange ideas with some fascinating colleagues.
No comments:
Post a Comment