Fulbright program's possible demise would be calamitous
Using the flimsy excuse of eliminating fraud and waste, the administration and its congressional sycophants are seeking to severely cripple or even terminate the impactful Fulbright Program and its international exchange cousins. 

The demise of Fulbright and other international exchange programs would undermine U.S. interests around the world, making the country less secure, less respected, and less prosperous.

Fulbright is the nation’s flagship educational and cultural exchange program, conducted in partnership with 160 countries. As a three-time Fulbright Scholar (Moldova 2001 and 2023-24; Azerbaijan 2007), I can attest to the program’s tremendously positive impact at home and abroad. 

The first shot has been fired. Last month, the administration cancelled Fulbright-Hayes grants for fiscal year 2025. More than 400 applicants for group and dissertation projects and faculty research had already been submitted for the program this year. (Inside Higher Ed).  Besides Fulbright-Hayes, the Fulbright program includes initiatives that send U.S. university faculty overseas to teach (Scholar Program), students overseas to learn (Student Program) and teach (English Teaching Assistant Program), and international students to come to the U.S. (Foreign Student program). About 8,000 Fulbrighters participate in the program each year.

The program has operated independently and with bipartisan support since its inception in 1946, until now.

In the current FY26 budget, the Trump administration and its congressional minions are  proposing to essentially eliminate State Department funding for education and exchange programs, cutting the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) from $741 million to $50 million—a 94% reduction. (ECA funds Fulbright, other international exchange programs like the International Visitor Leadership Program, and entities like the East-West Center, where I’m proud to work.)

The rationale for these budget cuts is that ECA programs like Fulbright are supposedly inefficient and poorly monitored. This is transparently nonsensical. The last Inspector General report on ECA was done in 2021 did not report any fraud. As to the poor monitoring charge, “Exchange programs are some of the most monitored and evaluated programs in the government. U.S. organizations that implement State Department exchange programs are strong and scrupulous partners who exhibit consistent quality and accountability,” according to the Alliance for International Education.

Further, Fulbright is being undermined by administration meddling in the selection process, leading nearly all the members of the Fulbright board to resign earlier this month. In a statement, the board said, “This proud legacy has depended on one thing above all: the integrity of the program’s selection process based on merit, not ideology, and its insulation from political interference. That integrity is now undermined.” 

What’s the real reason behind these myopic, ill-informed attacks on international exchanges and education? I believe they represent the same guttural reflex the administration has displayed as it’s attacked higher education more broadly. Education and international exchanges open minds and hearts, and more generally make the public less malleable and susceptible to the disinformation that is the life blood of MAGA. Vice president J.D. Vance said the quiet part aloud in 2021 when he commented during an address that higher ed “gives credibility to some of the most ridiculous ideas that exist in this country.” His address was titled, “The Universities are the Enemy.” (The Guardian). Further, programs like Fulbright are in the crosshairs because they clash with MAGA's narrow-minded “America First” ideology since Fulbright is a dynamic demonstration of the value of multiculturalism and global interdependence. It’s hard to imagine any Fulbrighter supporting a travel ban, for example.

If Fulbright is guillotined, the impact will be calamitous. As the Fulbright board stated, “The erosion of the Fulbright program weakens America and our national security interests. Institutions and the rule of law matter and have distinguished our country for almost 250 years."

If international exchanges are terminated, lost will be opportunities for 15,000 American participants who travel abroad on Fulbright and other State Department exchanges every year. These ambassadors gain “critical skills and experiences that set them up for success in the global marketplace.” Also lost will be private and international government contributions to American public diplomacy.  According to the Alliance for International Education, “The Global Ties U.S. network of 90+ community-based nonprofits in all 50 states that implement the International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP) sees an 11:1 return on federal investment – for every federal dollar spent on their programs conducted in the United States, these organizations generate $11 more.”  

When he was a senator, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, like many of his congressional colleagues, used to write his constituents who received Fulbright grants. His letter congratulated them on the “exceptional opportunity” they were being given to participate in an “impactful program” that is highly effective at “building a relationship between our great nation and another country.” (Alliance for International Education).

Rubio's right. Fulbright and other international exchanges deserve his support, the support of his boss, and the support of our nation.

Considering the consequences of our reporting in South Asia
I’m often asked about the peace journalism characteristic that asks journalists to consider the consequences of their reporting. Specifically, what does this mean? My response, to avoid disseminating content that pours extra gasoline onto the fire or that deepens divisions among groups and nations, is usually met with polite nods. However, I seldom see the light bulbs illuminate above my trainees heads.

Now, I have a good example of exactly what “consider the consequences” means.

I ran across an article* last month during the India-Pakistan violence that was well researched and well written. It critically analyzed a problem on the other side (an Indian analyzing Pakistan, or vice-versa), and reached logical conclusions that were supported by the evidence and quotes presented.

Sounds fine, right?

A quick perusal of the comments posted at the bottom of the article, however, showed that the story primarily succeeded in stirring up additional hated against “them.” The commenters wrote that the story confirmed the negative information that the writers already knew about “them” and “their” citizens. In fact, anyone who read the article on “our” side couldn’t help but come away with a more negative opinion of “them.”

Now, the story was correct as far as it went. What the article failed to mention was that the exact same problem that was spotlighted occurs just as much on “our” side as it does on theirs. The article had no context, only the misleading insinuation that this problem exclusively belongs to “them.”

A better, peace journalism article would’ve noted that the problem occurs equally on both sides. It would state that both Indian and Pakistani societies are damaged by this problem, and that both societies need to work to find solutions that address the issue.

Using this approach, bridges of commonality are being built instead of walls of derision and hatred. It’s a shame that the author didn’t consider the consequences of their reporting. The consequence of this article is that a few more people in the subcontinent have had their worst impressions about their so-called enemies reinforced.

*I’m not naming the article or journalist, since my goal here is not to shame anyone. I can say that the author was not one of the East-West Center’s cross border journalists who set an admirable example during the recent violence. See my blog for details: https://stevenyoungblood.blogspot.com/2025/05/amid-violence-pakistani-indian.html

Discussing natural resources in the New Mexico governor's office

Young leaders learn peace media; explore resource protection
The concept of peace media is resonating with a  team of young Southeast Asian leaders who are wrapping up a fellowship in the United States.

The young leaders from across Southeast Asia, aged 18-25, were in Honolulu for 25 days,  and Santa Fe, NM for five days. They’re in Washington, DC now to wrap up the fellowship. During this program, they're learning about natural resources and their management while they develop community projects to enhance natural resource protection in their home countries.

My part in this project has been to work with the young leaders on understanding and mitigating disinformation, using peace media approaches, and developing a communications plan to promote their natural resource protection projects. In informal discussions after my sessions, the concept of peace media seems to especially intrigued the young leaders. Peace media is when content creators, and those who share content online, disseminate information with peace in mind. This means rejecting hateful and divisive language and images, and instead using their platforms to build bridges and encourage a sense of community.

The plans they created to promote their natural resource protection projects were nuanced and sophisticated, taking into account their audiences and the best platforms for disseminating information. I was impressed with their work.

Mock trial, Honolulu--Land rights

Our communication discussions were only part of the larger project, cleverly designed by the East West Center’s Lance Boyd. The fellows were constantly challenged and engaged by fascinating activities like a mock trial centering on indigenous land rights; a visit to ancient cliff dwellings in New Mexico; and a boat trip to look at resource protection along the Anacostia River in Washington. One of the highlights was a meeting in the New Mexico’s governor’s office, where the fellows discussed natural resources (indigenous lands, water resources, and food insecurity) with the governor’s staff, who were impressed with the research and thoughtful analysis done by the fellows. 

As the project concludes, the fellows will return to their home countries (Thailand, Indonesia, Brunei, Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam, etc.) and launch their resource protection projects. Given the fellows’ professional competence and boundless energy, I have no doubt that each of these projects will be an overwhelming success.

ON A PERSONAL NOTE, I had to leave the program a few days early to deal with a family emergency. Upon hearing the news, the fellows showered me with kindness and warm wishes that I will never forget. Thank you, young leaders.

Stargazing, and staying warm, in Santa Fe, NM

Amid violence, Pakistani-Indian journalists spread goodwill
In the wake of the recent Pakistan-India violence, online disinformation and hate speech is flourishing.

In both countries, Facebook and X have been “awash” with misrepresented claims that have been amplified by media outlets the have published “false or unverifiable claims of military victories that experts say have exacerbated tensions and contributed to a flood of hate speech.” (France24) This mis and disinformation includes “doctored clips, misleading war footage, and AI-generated content. Footage from unrelated conflicts—like those in Gaza and Ukraine—(have been) passed off as fresh evidence from the India-Pakistan front.” (The420)  

However, there is a group of Indian and Pakistani journalists who are paddling against this malevolent, hateful current.  Not coincidentally, these journalists were part of a cross-border reporting project spearheaded by the East-West Center.

Since 2015, about 150 Indian and Pakistani journalists have participated in EWC cross border reporting projects. I was one of the trainers for two of these initiatives in 2022 and 2024. In both years, we met the journalists online first, then in person in Nepal, for trainings that included peace journalism, multimedia reporting skills, as well as content-specific strategies on reporting the environment, business, agriculture, and health. After the trainings, the journalists teamed up (one Indian, one Pakistani) to report on issues of mutual importance. (Click here to access some of their reports and to see a short video where the journalists discuss their experiences as cross border reporters).

As part of each workshop, the journalists connected on WhatsApp. They have continued to interact on this platform even years after the cross border reporting project officially ended. Usually, they use WhatsApp to share stories they’ve written, seek feedback, and make requests of one another (e.g. “Does anyone know a gynecologist who can comment on the connection of heat and its effects on women’s health?”).

Knowing that many of the journalists are still active on WhatsApp, it was with some trepidation that I finally signed on myself to see what they’ve been saying about the recent violence South Asia that nearly sparked an all-out war.

I had no reason for concern. In fact, I couldn’t have been more thrilled with what I read.

“OK guys, just putting it out there,” was the first message I saw after the violence erupted. “Please stay safe wherever you are and on whichever side of the border. Take care. Love and peace to you.”

Other messages stuck a similar tone. “Stay safe everyone, love and hugs,” read one. Others said, “This time shall pass,” “Hopeful,” "Following this, we have a lot of work to stitch up the holes,” and perhaps my favorite, “May peace come soon. May love be stronger than hate for all people on both sides.”

Since the recent violence, there has not been one negative comment in their WhatsApp group.

This WhatsApp lovefest in the midst of violence is a reflection on the character of the cross-border journalists. Imagine how difficult it must be for Indians and Pakistanis to speak out about the humanity of their supposed “enemies” while a violent conflict rages?  To fall into line and spout reflexive patriotism and assign blame to the “enemy” is easy, but to paddle against the current with messages of compassion, tolerance, and peace takes genuine bravery.

The journalists’ determined commitment to one another and to “the better angels of our nature” is validation for the concept of cross border collaboration which was pioneered at the East-West Center by Susan Kreifels and her colleagues. If these journalists hadn’t met, hadn’t learned and worked together, would such a show of humanity be possible? Kreifels and cross border project trainers Randy Smith, Laura Ungar, Steve Rice, and Sara Shipley-Hiles have been the perfect role models and trainers for these journalists, adeptly dispensing their unique, invaluable brand of compassionate professionalism.

The last note on the subject on the WhatsApp thread was written by one of the strongest, smartest female journalists I know. She summed it up nicely, writing, “Guys, we did it. We proved we can be professional for the greater good despite patriotism. It was tough but we made it. You should be proud of yourselves for rising to the occasion. (Heart emoji). I am proud to know you.”

So am I.

Young leaders in Santa Fe
I just landed in Santa Fe, NM with 25 young leaders from Southeast Asia. We're continuing a program that's been underway in Hawaii the last three weeks (see previous blogs). Stay tuned for updates.

 

 

Press Freedom Day event promotes peace journalism in S. Asia
I’ve been privileged to have two consecutive meaningful experiences on World Press Freedom Day.

Last year, I spent the day with my colleagues from the Independent Journalism Center and the Independent Press Association protesting Russian disinformation and mistreatment of journalists in front of the Russian embassy in Chisinau, Moldova.

Last Saturday, World Press Freedom Day 2025, I was honored to be invited to speak via Zoom at an event sponsored by Aaghaz-e-Dosti, an Indian-based organization dedicated to building better relations between Indians and Pakistanis. (Aaghaz-e-Dosti literally means, the beginning of friendship). The presentation came at an especially fraught time given the recent deadly attack that killed 26 people in Kashmir, and today’s news of a missile test and military drills in the region. (Reuters) 

I gave an overview of peace journalism, and then answered a barrage of really good questions from the audience, including an insightful query about the role of media in peacebuilding. I pointed to an East-West Center cross-border reporting project that teamed up Indian and Pakistani journalists to report stories as an example of such collaborations can help to set the table for peace. But I was clear that journalists and journalism alone can’t bring peace—that the work we do as peace journalists is only one ingredient in a complicated recipe for peace.

One of the 25 attendees was Ms. Ela Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi’s granddaughter. She commented that there is a great deal in common between what Mahatma Gandhi said about journalism, and the concept of peace journalism. I agree. The principles he embraced included rejecting “us vs. them reporting,” media as a tool for de-escalation, and media as a tool to foster reconciliation. (See The Peace Journalist magazine, October 2019). 

I admire the work that Aaghaz-e-Dosti does, in their words, “to eradicate mutual hatred and suspicion and desires to create unwavering bonds of peace and friendship. This is because we believe that miscommunication and lack of communication has helped sustain the conflict.  To meet our objective, Aaghaz-e-Dosti has taken several initiatives ranging from interactive sessions in schools to public demonstrations, from art-based initiatives to writing articles and issuing statements. We are moving towards our aim through peace education and advocacy among common people, young minds on both sides of border through widespread network and dedicated volunteers.” 

I share Aaghaz-e-Dosti's commitment to fostering peace and friendship in South Asia.

Young leaders study storytelling, natural resources in Honolulu
There’s nothing like 25 young people to stir things up. I mean that in a positive way, of course.

The young leaders from across Southeast Asia, aged 18-25, are here in Honolulu for a project concentrating on protecting natural resources. They’ll spend 25 days in Honolulu. Then, they’ll travel to Santa Fe, NM for five days, and finally on to Washington, DC for another four days. During this program, they're learning about natural resources and their management while they develop community projects to enhance natural resource protection in their home countries.

I’m meeting with them six times during their stay here, then accompanying them to Santa Fe and DC. Our discussions are geared towards helping them develop successful communications campaigns to promote and enhance their community resource sustainability projects. So far, we’ve talked about storytelling techniques, mis and disinformation, and media literacy. One theme I keep hitting is the importance of humanizing their online storytelling for maximum impact. The young leaders have been active, inquisitive, and engaged—the perfect students.

Their first full week in Honolulu also included a wonderful cruise on a traditional native Hawaiian vessel, a theatrical performance featuring vignettes from actresses portraying female Hawaiian historical figures, and a visit with a giant inflatable whale on Earth Day.

I look forward to being continually stirred during the next month!

Young Southeast Asian leaders arrive in Honolulu
One of the coolest projects I’ve ever been involved in began today with, fittingly, a fun session on how to make (and appreciate) an authentic Hawaiian lei. (pictured)

A group of 25 young leaders from across Southeast Asia has convened here in Honolulu for a project themed on protecting natural resources. They’ll spend 25 days in Honolulu. Then, the cohort will travel to Santa Fe, NM for five days, and finally on to Washington, DC for another four days. All along the way, they’ll be learning about natural resources and their management while they devise community projects to enhance natural resource protection in their home countries.

My role in this project is to teach sessions on mis and disinformation, peace social media, and media literacy, with an eye toward developing a proactive social media strategy to enhance their community projects.

Even after just one day, I can tell that these young leaders, aged 20-25, are smart, dedicated, and energetic. I look forward getting to know them as I teach during the next three weeks, and as I accompany them to New Mexico and DC.

Stay tuned for details.

PS--I’ve already alerted the participants about the joys of New Mexico green chiles, which I plan to consume in nearly obscene quantities!

 

New Peace Journalist magazine hits the newsstands
The April 2025 issue of The Peace Journalist magazine is out, and includes great features about innovative PJ programs in Uganda, Pakistan, Madagascar, as well as a great story about an upcoming symposium by Making Peace Visible (You can sign up for their newsletter at https://www.makingpeacevisible.org/ ) 

The magazine is posted on Scribd--https://www.scribd.com/document/847295036/Peace-Journalist-April-2025 . Enjoy!

Event examines PJ, empathy, rebuilding trust in media
(Milwaukee, Wisconsin)-Re-framing, and re-emphasizing, peace journalism approaches was on the menu on Friday at the insightful 2025 Nieman Symposium sponsored by Marquette University’s Diederich College of Communications.

The event featured two panels and a keynoter addressing the subject, “Journalism in the face of conflict and contemporary politics.”

The re-framing content came from Dr. Sue Robinson from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She framed peace journalism as a practice that should be guided by care—caring about the subjects we report about; and being a caregiver for those who have been marginalized or victimized. Robinson laid out five qualities of care for the audience of students and faculty members. These are attentiveness, responsibility, confidence, responsiveness, and solidarity. She also emphasized the importance of community building, and of listening and learning, that in turn stoke the empathy that journalists need.

While she didn’t use the term peace journalism, I think Dr. Robinson hit upon a key PJ principle nonetheless—that to build bridges, give a voice to the marginalized, offer counternarratives, and do the other things peace journalists do, one must have a foundation build on empathy.

Catherine Gicheru (L), Sudeshna Roy at Marquette Univ.

The event’s keynote speaker, Kenyan journalist, editor, and founder of the African Women Journalists’ Project Catherine Gicheru, re-emphasized many of the most compelling justifications for peace journalism. She talked about the divisive forces corroding society, including political polarization, economic marginalization, societal exclusion, and disinformation. Gicheru challenged the traditional objectivity model, noting that “Journalism is never neutral,” and that it is a journalist’s responsibility to speak truth to power.

She also opined about how journalists can help restore the public’s trust in the media by re-thinking the voices they amplify (“voice of the voiceless” in PJ parlance); working with survivors; and connecting with regular people on the ground through mechanisms like community radio. Gicheru stressed the importance of these connections, noting that, “Building bridges starts with the stories we tell.”

Building bridges is one of the concepts I emphasized in my presentation that began with the basics of peace journalism, then slid into a discussion of my recent PJ work. This includes bridge building cross border journalism programs with Indian and Pakistani journalists, as well as a project that brought together journalists from Northern Ireland and Kosovo to discuss how to responsibly report about past violent events in both places, and how those events are memorialized.

Other informative panelists included exiled journalists Pedro Molina and Juan Carlos Ampie from Nicaragua, and Anuradha Bhasin from Indian-controlled Kashmir. They discussed how journalists were silenced in their countries. Bhasin said journalism was “torn limb by limb” in Kashmir. All three warned that the same can happen here in the U.S., or anywhere. Molina noted that the best way to keep our rights is to exercise them.

Dr. Susan Moeller from the University of Maryland also presented an interesting discussion about what makes news consumers care about the world, and about how peace journalism and ethical journalism are synonymous.

It was an honor to be among these august panelists, and to hear support for the concepts of peace journalism, whether it was called that or not. Hats off to Dr. Sudeshna Roy for organizing this vitally important event.

Exiles journalists' panel, Nieman Symposium

Media development cutoffs threaten democracies worldwide
International media outlets and media development projects, like many of the initiatives I’ve been engaged in for years, have been severely impacted by the cutoff of U.S. foreign aid funding and the decimation of USAID. 

These cutoffs are ill-conceived and deeply damaging to democracy around the world as well at America's national interest.

The foreign aid freeze includes $268 million that was targeted to support independent media and a free flow of information around the world. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) “denounces this decision, which has plunged NGOs, media outlets, and journalists doing vital work into chaotic uncertainty.” RSF says, “The affected organizations include large international NGOs that support independent media like the International Fund for Public Interest Media and smaller, individual media outlets serving audiences living under repressive conditions in countries like Iran and Russia.” RSF reports that according to a USAID fact sheet which has since been taken offline, in 2023, “the agency funded training and support for 6,200 journalists, assisted 707 non-state news outlets, and supported 279 media-sector civil society organizations dedicated to strengthening independent media.” 

Further, “The ripple effects of the aid freeze … also threaten to cripple news organizations that indirectly rely on USAID and State Department support via groups such as the National Endowment for Democracy. The non-governmental organization is funded by the U.S. government and provided $51 million in support to media outlets in 2022, according to a press release.” (ICJI)

In addition, the funding stoppage will also “set back the global movement for media freedom by years,” according to an  insightful article by Nicholas Benequista.

The freeze also torpedoed important programs to combat disinformation in Eastern Europe, including Moldova, which is ground zero for corrosive Russian propaganda. I was incensed to hear the president list “32 million for a left wing propaganda operation in Moldova” as an example of wasteful spending during his speech to congress in March. This “propaganda operation” was in fact not propaganda, but well-calibrated programming to counter Russian disinformation and give Moldova a chance for a prosperous, democratic future. To callously criticize this worthwhile endeavor empowers the propagandists in Moscow and legitimizes their dark agenda. (You can read about these laudable anti-disinformation efforts in the April 2024 Peace Journalist magazine.)

Since 2007, many of my endeavors teaching peace journalism, media literacy, and countering  disinformation have been funded directly or indirectly through the U.S. government, including the Pakistan radio project detailed in this magazine (pg. 4); a year-long project that succeeded in preventing media-induced election violence in Uganda; a cross-border reporting project that united Indian and Pakistani journalists to use storytelling to build bridges instead of fuel hatred; and a peace journalism project that taught reporters in the Sahel region how to counter violent extremism—hardly “left wing propaganda.” And this doesn’t even count the work I’ve done as a three-time Fulbright Scholar, including my projects last year in Moldova (for content creators and for fifth graders) that taught youth to recognize and counter disinformation.

I’m proud of all of these projects and their demonstrably positive impacts, and believe each to be a smart, efficient use of taxpayer funds. All of my projects put together, and the $268 million of media aid currently frozen, don’t come close to adding up the cost of just one F-22 fighter jet--$350 million. (Aerotime)

This media development work, and the projects done by USAID and its sister organizations like the U.S. Institute of Peace and the East-West Center, where I am a journalism program coordinator, make the U.S more secure by making the world a more peaceful place—all at a tiny fraction of the cost of military hardware or interventions.

Given our perilous world, we should be doubling down on projects that fund free press and combating disinformation--not doing the opposite.

Indian, Pakistani reporters resume cross border conversations
Among the dozens of media and peace journalism projects I’ve done, the cross border journalism initiative launched by the East-West Center stands out for the quality and audacity of its participants—Indians and Pakistanis who transcend boundaries and unite for the cause of good journalism.

In this project, Pakistani and Indian journalists learn together (production, peace journalism, economic, health, and environmental reporting), and then break up into teams of one Indian and one Pakistani to jointly report issues of importance.

I had a chance to meet some of these journalists last night on Zoom for a concept we call, Cross Border Conversations. Our discussion began with journalists Ravinder Singh and Shiraz Hasnat, who discussed their jointly produced story about a radio station that reaches across the border. Both said there were obstacles in producing and publishing the stories, and especially getting Indian publications to use the Pakistani reporter’s byline, and vice-versa. Despite these challenges, the feedback from readers were very positive since the story took such a unique angle.  

Then, Husnain Raza from the media NGO Global Neighborhood for Media Innovation (GNMI) gave a short presentation about five recent workshops for radio journalists (called Frequency +) held in Sindh and Balochistan provinces in Pakistan. I was fortunate enough to meet and train these 108 journalists in January. The workshops included content production, AI, writing multimedia copy, and scriptwriting for podcasts. (See my blogs describing my wonderful experiences in Pakistan).

Finally, we closed with a discussion about the future of cross border programming. One possible cross border project would be with and through GNMI, and involve Pakistani and U.S. journalists. However, that’s on hold due to the pause of U.S. government funding. Another possible cross border project is in the works with a different media NGO. This is in the planning stages, but might tentatively focus on teaming up newsrooms in India with their Pakistani counterparts.

As always, it was a pleasure seeing and chatting with my South Asian colleagues. I look forward to our next cross border conversation in May.

 

Aid, refugee cutoff reporting reflects peace journalism principles
As USAID is dismantled, government workers are laid off, and the refugee resettlement program is halted, there is at least one small ray of sunshine—ubiquitous news media reporting about these events that reflects the best principles of peace journalism.

As a peace journalist, the focus should naturally be on the humanitarian angle of the story, on storytelling that gives a voice to the marginalized and victimized, and on discussions about mitigating the fallout of these government decisions moving forward. There is an abundance of journalism that is doing just that. 

The results of a small Google news search study done on Feb. 12 for stories filed during the last month are interesting. The search looked for “USAID” and then drilled down by adding different terms in quote marks.  The good news--there is an abundance of news about the foreign agencies that depend on USAID funding. A search for “crisis foreign aid organizations” showed 198,000 stories, while there were 344,430 hits combined for “overseas agencies impacted,” “impact local provider,” and “local agencies.” For example, "USAID Kenya partner has no funds to carry out PEPFAR waiver" on Devex discusses how a program to fight AIDS may have to stop, while “Nonprofits, NGOs scramble to provide global aid amid USAID uncertainty” by ABC News discusses the battle to keep aid agencies afloat. In the article, a humanitarian aid organization leader “described conversation with lawmakers who were, they said, in disbelief to hear that organizations who are trying to continue lifesaving work delivering food and water were still locked out the federal payment system and unable to access cash. ‘Surely, there is cash?' I had to say, 'No, no, there is no cash.’ the humanitarian aid leader told ABC News. ‘We are having to first get through that disbelief that this would actually be happening in this way.’”

Similarly, there have been a number of published stories that highlight the humanitarian impacts of the foreign aid cutoff, especially in those domains most impacted. The Google search study showed, for example, 333,000 stories on “USAID” and “health programs” and 114,000 stories on “USAID” and “AIDS.” There are many exemplary peace journalism-style stories reporting the human toll angle of the story, for example, several Nicolas Kristof pieces in the New York Times, including “The USAID chaos already has dire effects;” “Fear, pain and Hunger: The dire impact of U.S. funding cuts” in the Washington Post; and “USAID freeze risks 'deadly consequences' as work halts in Gaza, agencies warn” on NBC News.

There has also been a laudable spotlight on the victims of the stoppage in refugee resettlement to the U.S. The Google news search showed 179,000 such stories using the search “refugee resettlement.”  These include excellent stories like “‘Life is so dark’: Trump cancels flights to KC for 108 refugees fleeing war, persecution” in the Kansas City Star; and “A Utah agency rented apartments, bought food for refugee families. Now they’re on hold” in the Deseret News.

Peace journalists need to remain vigilant when reporting the aid and refugee cutoffs, and need to keep their focus on humanitarian issues more generally as they report about the myriad impacts of the drive to slash government programs and workers.

Call for Articles: The Peace Journalist magazine
The Peace Journalist, a semi-annual magazine produced by the Center for Global Peace Journalism/Steven Youngblood, is seeking submissions for its April edition. Submissions should be 600-1600 words, and

address peace journalism/peace media research and projects. Please also submit photos, if possible. We do not run articles about general peace projects or processes unless they have a strong media component or angle.

The previous edition of The Peace Journalist, our 25th published magazine, can be found at
https://www.scribd.com/document/774752030/The-Peace-Journalist-mag-Oct-2024

The deadline for submissions is March 5. The magazine usually fills up quickly, so the sooner you can get your pieces in, the better. Please submit to steven.youngblood@fulbrightmail.org .

Thank you in advance for your submissions.

Best wishes,

Steven L. Youngblood
Editor, The Peace Journalist
Journalism Program Coordinator, East-West Center

Editing podcast scripts at Quetta radio seminar

Balochistan region overcomes reputation
(QUETTA, BALOCHISTAN PROVINCE, PAKISTAN)—I always love coming to so-called “dangerous” places because my visits always confirm the fact that they really aren’t as bad as they’re portrayed to be. Lebanon and Ethiopia immediately come to mind.

When it comes to dangerous reputations, not many places exceed this region and city, situated only 120 miles from the Afghan border.

Google “Quetta Balochistan news” and you’ll get stories about an attack on a police academy, an attack on a church, the educational crisis, and so on. Google “Quetta Balochistan terrorism” and you’ll get more stories than Google can count.

Despite this, my impressions of this place are entirely positive. Yes, violence does occur here, but Balochistan is much more than just terrorist attacks.

I’m here working with radio journalists on script writing and podcasting on a project organized by the Global Neighborhood for Media Innovation, the U.S. Consulate-Karachi, and the East-West Center, which is lending my services as a trainer to the project. 

During this seminar, I led a discussion about peace journalism. One of PJ’s principles is to offer counternarratives to de bunk media generated and perpetuated stereotypes, myths, and misperceptions. This principle is obviously applicable to Balochistan, since 99% of the news about the region is negative, and spotlights only violence. Peace journalism practitioners would look to tell counternarrative stories about Balochistan—stories about business, education, commerce, athletes, etc., that give a more complete view of the people and region.

Balochistan journalists learn about podcasting

We also discussed the obstacles facing journalists here, including slow and unreliable internet. For journalists looking both to research and to disseminate stories, the lack of good internet complicates their job, which is complex enough to begin with given the security issues journalists face in the region.

One of the 23 participating journalists also asked about how to best report in a conflict zone. Taking care of their own security is most important, of course. After that, I said that sometimes the best we can do is to not make a bad situation worse by sensationalizing the violence, prematurely blaming this or that group for an attack, or creating even more hatred against the perpetrators or their ethnic group.

I admire these journalists for their resilience. Working here is difficult, yet they seem committed to upholding the best principles of the profession.

I look forward to my next visit to Quetta, and hope to have more time to explore the scenic beauty of this misunderstood place.

 

 

 

A police escort clears the way for a somewhat dubious VIP.

King of the Road, thanks to peace journalism
(SOMEWHERE BETWEEN SUKKUR AND KARACHI, PAKISTAN)—I’ve been told about the legendary traffic jams on Pakistan’s roadways, so it was with much trepidation that my colleagues and I undertook an 8 hour trip south from Sukkur (where we’d just held a seminar) to Karachi.

But just as we reached our first jam, a mysterious and wonderful sight maneuvered in front of our car—a beat up Toyota pickup truck with carrying several uniformed men. Our cavalry had arrived—a police escort!

This was thing of transcendent beauty. Our escorts, which traded off every 30 or 60 minutes or so, stayed in front of us, blaring their sirens while enthusiastically gesticulating to traffic clogging the passing lane (our new home), waving over sluggish motorists, or motioning for them to stay put in the slow lane. We got some dirty looks, and more than a few curious ones. After all, they wanted to know who was getting this VIP treatment. When they saw it was me, their curious looks turned into puzzled ones. My amused colleague Husnain especially loved it when we sailed through toll booths, noting that “we’re living like kings.”

Even big trucks quaked in our presence

Why did we have a police escort? One colleague said that police want to escort all foreigners as they traverse the open road, just in case there’s trouble. Yet, that seems an impossible task, both in terms of having enough escort cars, and keeping track of the movements of all the foreigners. The only way the police knew about us (me) was through a hotel I had stayed in that had contacted the officials, saying that we were on the road.

So then, why did I merit this VIP treatment? One might think that it’s because I’m here representing the well-respected East-West Center (EWC). However, the president, vice president, and a program officer from the EWC were in Pakistan not too long ago, and were not escorted. Since I have just worked for the EWC for a few months, I will probably not rub in the fact that I was escorted and the higher ups were not.

My marginally plausible theory is that we (I) got the escort because the authorities are big fans of peace journalism.  Husnain readily agreed, noting that peace journalism teachers are respected worldwide. We theorized that the police Googled my name, learned about my activities promoting peace journalism, and tripped all over themselves arranging my escort. I’m pretty sure Husnain wasn’t entirely serious about this.

At any rate, the escort saved us 30-45 minutes.

After this arduous journey, we arrived at the hotel, and I was upgraded, at no extra cost, to a suite. Obviously, it was peace journalism at work once more.

Nothing stood in our way, thanks to our police escorts.

Pakistani journalists explore AI, podcasting
(KARACHI, PAKISTAN)—I always love being in South Asia. It may be the food, but more likely, it’s the people, who are among the most energetic, intellectually curious folks I’ve encountered in my many travels.

That intellectual curiosity is on display here in Karachi at a two-day training on radio capacity building run by the Global Neighborhood for Media Innovation (GNMI) with support from the East-West Center, who has lent me to GMNI for two weeks as one of the project’s trainers. The initiative is funded by the U.S. Consulate-Karachi. 

Ayaz Khan and journalists work on a video podcast

The program for 23 radio journalists got underway Monday with local trainers GMNI’s Mushtaq Ahmed and AI expert Ayaz Khan discussing trends in radio content production, U.S.-Pakistani cooperation for sustainable development, and AI and radio programming. This hands-on training included recording and editing podcast segments. Interestingly, the trainers fed the workshop’s agenda into an AI generator and asked it to produce an audio podcast. The result was a sometimes amusing and often trite back-and-forth discussion by a fake man and a fake woman about the training. The AI podcast could pass as a real one—but not a very good real one, since the hosts continually spouted vacuous, faux conversational commentary (wow, cool, super cool, seriously, “like,” etc.)

I was so intrigued by this that I made my own AI podcast about the just-completed East-West Center Jefferson Fellowships. (See posts from December). I'm still not too impressed, though I must admit it does a pretty good job of summarizing the content.

The journalists were understandably engaged during the AI demonstrations, as they were during a discussion about the problems plaguing radio in Pakistan. The comments mostly focused on the financial crisis in the business that has led to small production budgets, smaller salaries, and heavier reliance on part time workers. “How do we monetize this” was a frequently asked question.

My sessions were on day two of the training. I discussed effective writing for broadcasting and podcasting, something I’ve taught for years as a professor. We went over some basics, things like using active voice and keeping sentences short and language conversational. They did some exercises which led up to my discussion of podcast scripting. The journalists were then tasked with creating their own podcast script.

The workshop attendees were engaged from the outset, which always seems to be the case when I work with journalists from Pakistan. They were very curious about peace journalism, which we discussed briefly as part of a question and answer exercise. At the end of the seminar, I was asked whether Trump would erode media freedoms in the US. I said a slight erosion is possible, though I believe (I hope) our legal and constitutional guard rails are up to the challenge.

Karachi is the first stop on a four-city tour that will eventually swing back to Karachi for our last workshop. I’m looking forward to seeing more of Pakistan, meeting more of its welcoming citizens, and eating many more flavorful dishes. Stay tuned for updates.

Peer reviewing journalists' stories

14.5 hours on an airplane, but two weeks in fascinating Pakistan
I’m gearing up for one of the world’s most grueling flights to one of the world’s most interesting places.

First, the flight: a 14.5 hour doozy from Seattle to Doha, the middle leg of a three-flight sequence that will take me from Honolulu to Karachi, Pakistan. The other two flights, 6 hours (Honolulu to Seattle) and 2.5 hours (Doha to Karachi), aren’t bad, but it’s the 14.5 hour flight that’s keeping me up at night. I had the travel agent look into what an upgrade to business/first class would cost on this flight, and the result was amazing--$20,000, which is just a bit out of reach for me. (In the same way that posterizing dunk over LeBron James is also beyond my abilities). So, I’ve had to settle for an aisle seat, confirmed, the whole way. (I was originally schedule to connect at LAX, but rebooked because of the possibility of wildfire-created disruptions). 

The reward on the other end is a couple of weeks in Pakistan, teaching radio and podcasting writing and production to journalists in four cities—Karachi, Quetta, Sukkur, and Hyderabad. I’ll be working with the Global Neighborhood for Media Innovation (GNMI) and their local trainers as well.

During my visit, I’ll also be hosting a dinner with the Pakistan Union of Journalists, and discussing the East-West Center’s long running Cross Border Reporting project with the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad. We hope to renew our partnership on this outstanding project that trains Indian and Pakistani journalists then pairs them up to jointly report stories of mutual interest, like climate change. 

Stay tuned for updates beginning next week, provided I survive the flight.