Aid, refugee cutoff reporting reflects peace journalism principles
As USAID is dismantled, government workers are laid off, and the refugee resettlement program is halted, there is at least one small ray of sunshine—ubiquitous news media reporting about these events that reflects the best principles of peace journalism.

As a peace journalist, the focus should naturally be on the humanitarian angle of the story, on storytelling that gives a voice to the marginalized and victimized, and on discussions about mitigating the fallout of these government decisions moving forward. There is an abundance of journalism that is doing just that. 

The results of a small Google news search study done on Feb. 12 for stories filed during the last month are interesting. The search looked for “USAID” and then drilled down by adding different terms in quote marks.  The good news--there is an abundance of news about the foreign agencies that depend on USAID funding. A search for “crisis foreign aid organizations” showed 198,000 stories, while there were 344,430 hits combined for “overseas agencies impacted,” “impact local provider,” and “local agencies.” For example, "USAID Kenya partner has no funds to carry out PEPFAR waiver" on Devex discusses how a program to fight AIDS may have to stop, while “Nonprofits, NGOs scramble to provide global aid amid USAID uncertainty” by ABC News discusses the battle to keep aid agencies afloat. In the article, a humanitarian aid organization leader “described conversation with lawmakers who were, they said, in disbelief to hear that organizations who are trying to continue lifesaving work delivering food and water were still locked out the federal payment system and unable to access cash. ‘Surely, there is cash?' I had to say, 'No, no, there is no cash.’ the humanitarian aid leader told ABC News. ‘We are having to first get through that disbelief that this would actually be happening in this way.’”

Similarly, there have been a number of published stories that highlight the humanitarian impacts of the foreign aid cutoff, especially in those domains most impacted. The Google search study showed, for example, 333,000 stories on “USAID” and “health programs” and 114,000 stories on “USAID” and “AIDS.” There are many exemplary peace journalism-style stories reporting the human toll angle of the story, for example, several Nicolas Kristof pieces in the New York Times, including “The USAID chaos already has dire effects;” “Fear, pain and Hunger: The dire impact of U.S. funding cuts” in the Washington Post; and “USAID freeze risks 'deadly consequences' as work halts in Gaza, agencies warn” on NBC News.

There has also been a laudable spotlight on the victims of the stoppage in refugee resettlement to the U.S. The Google news search showed 179,000 such stories using the search “refugee resettlement.”  These include excellent stories like “‘Life is so dark’: Trump cancels flights to KC for 108 refugees fleeing war, persecution” in the Kansas City Star; and “A Utah agency rented apartments, bought food for refugee families. Now they’re on hold” in the Deseret News.

Peace journalists need to remain vigilant when reporting the aid and refugee cutoffs, and need to keep their focus on humanitarian issues more generally as they report about the myriad impacts of the drive to slash government programs and workers.